
Most editors meet AI in the wrong place. They open a browser tab, generate a clip, download it, forget which version was the good one, and then spend twenty minutes re-downloading it at the right resolution. The generation step was fast; the handoff was slow. That is the real bottleneck in modern post-production, and it has very little to do with how clever the model is.
The better mental model is that AI is a source, not a destination. Your compositing application is still where timing, layering, color, and sound decisions get made. AI tools simply feed that pipeline with plates, mattes, upscales, and audio that used to require a shoot day, a green screen, or a week of manual keyframing.
Once you accept that framing, the workflow becomes concrete. You generate or enhance footage with a specific shot in mind. You bring it in at the correct frame rate, resolution, and color space. You use AI-assisted masking to isolate elements, AI-assisted tracking to attach them to the scene, and automation to handle the parts of the timeline that are pure repetition. Then you finish with the human judgments that AI is still bad at: pacing, emphasis, and taste.
This guide walks through that pipeline section by section, with the practical decisions that matter — settings, order of operations, and the mistakes that cost the most time.
Before you import a single generated clip, lock down the technical container of the project. Mismatched frame rates are the single most common source of judder and ghosting when AI footage meets camera footage, and fixing it late means re-rendering everything.
Decide the final frame rate before you do anything else. If your footage is 23.976 and your generated clips come out at 24 or 30, you have three options: conform the generated clip with frame blending, retime it with optical flow, or regenerate at the correct rate. Regenerating is usually cleanest when the shot is short and the prompt is reusable.
For social verticals, 30 or 60 fps is a reasonable target. For cinematic work, 24 or 23.976. Pick one and make it the project default so imported files inherit it.
Generated footage often arrives at 16:9 even when you are cutting a 9:16 vertical. Cropping a 1080p landscape clip into a 1080x1920 frame wastes most of the pixels. Where the tool supports it, generate natively in the target aspect ratio. Where it does not, generate at the highest resolution available and plan your crop with headroom — keep the subject near the center and avoid compositions that rely on the edges.
A simple structure that scales well:
01_SOURCE for camera and screen capture material02_GENERATED for AI video plates, sorted by shot number03_MATTES for exported alpha channels and masks04_AUDIO for voice, music, and effects05_COMPS for working compositions06_RENDERS for delivery versionsName generated files with the shot number and a version suffix. SH07_drone_push_v03.mp4 tells you far more at a glance than output_final_2.mp4.
The most useful generated footage is boring footage. A clean aerial push over a coastline, a slow dolly through an empty corridor, a loop of drifting particles — these composite easily because they have simple motion and no uncanny details to explain.
Describe the shot the way a cinematographer would. Instead of "a city at night," write "slow dolly forward along a wet street at night, shallow depth of field, neon reflections, camera height about chest level, no cuts." Camera movement terms — dolly, crane, handheld, orbit, static — give you control over how the plate behaves once it is in the timeline.
Add constraints that protect compositing work:
If a generated clip has a warped hand, a melting background, or a flickering light source, do not try to paint it out. Regenerate with a tighter prompt, a different seed, or a shorter duration. Cleanup work costs far more than a second generation pass.
One exception: minor flicker and noise respond well to temporal denoise and to AI upscaling tools that stabilize detail between frames. If the motion is right and only the grain is wrong, keep the clip and clean it.
If you must crop into a generated clip, upscale it first. Running a 1080p source through an AI upscaler to 4K and then cropping to a 1080p region preserves far more detail than cropping first and scaling up afterward. Do the upscale as a separate rendered pass so you are never waiting on it inside a comp.
This is where AI has changed the daily reality of compositing the most. Work that used to define an entire shift — isolating a subject frame by frame — now takes minutes with a good matte and a cleanup pass.
Generate an alpha matte for your subject, then import it as a luma or alpha track. The standard trick is to use the matte as a track matte on a copy of the layer, with a second copy underneath as a fill. This lets you grade, blur, or displace the subject independently without touching the background.
Quality checks worth running on every matte:
Roto Brush and Refine Matte handle edge softness and motion blur well when fed a decent starting point. Simple chokers and feathering with the matte tools can fix most remaining artifacts. For stubborn interior holes, a duplicate matte layer with a higher-contrast source and a Track Matte in Subtract mode often closes them without manual painting.
Generated footage with a flat, even background — a cyc wall, a clean sky, a solid backdrop — keys faster and better than any subject-aware matte. If you control generation, ask for plain backgrounds on shots you know you will isolate. Reserving masking for complex real-world footage keeps your schedule predictable.
AI-generated clips frequently have camera motion that is smooth but not geometrically consistent. That is fine for a background plate and painful when you need to attach a graphic to a surface.
Choose a tracking region with high contrast and no motion blur. If the whole shot is soft, run a stabilization pass first to remove micro-jitter, then track the stabilized version, then apply the resulting data to your element layer with the inverse stabilization applied.
When you need to place text, signage, or a screen replacement inside a generated environment, a 3D camera solve gives you a virtual camera that matches the plate's motion. The trick is to give the solver enough parallax. Shots with a pure sideways pan and no depth movement will produce a flat, unreliable solve. If you plan on doing inserts, generate shots with actual forward or orbital movement.
Full-frame stabilization fights intentional camera motion. Use a position-only stabilization when you want to keep a deliberate tilt or handheld feel but remove jitter, and reserve full stabilization for locked-off shots that drifted.
The timeline is full of decisions you only need to make once. Automation handles the rest.
If you produce a recurring format — a weekly explainer, a product spot, a social cutdown — build one master composition with placeholder layers, then duplicate it per episode. Change the footage and text, keep the structure. AI-generated b-roll slots into the same placeholder positions every week, which removes the biggest source of inconsistency in fast-turnaround work.
Set up two or three output templates in advance: a high-quality master, a compressed social version, and a review version at half resolution. Naming these once saves you from re-entering settings on every delivery.
Generated stills and illustrations are cheap to produce and easy to animate badly. The difference between a polished animated still and an amateur one is almost always depth separation.
Split the artwork into foreground, midground, and background layers. Use a depth estimation pass or manual masking to create separation. Then apply small, offset camera moves: the background moves 2 percent, the midground 5 percent, the foreground 10 percent. Add a slight rotation on the closest layer. That parallax reads as depth even though the source is flat.
For text, keep it in native text layers rather than baked into generated imagery. You want full control over kerning, timing, and localization. Animate type with simple, fast easing rather than heavy presets — restraint reads as confidence.
Adding grain that matches the plate is the final step that sells a flat still as footage. Match the grain size to the background resolution, not the foreground, or the composite will look layered.
Audio is where AI-assisted workflows pay off faster than most editors expect.
Generate scratch narration early so you can cut picture to a real read instead of guessing timing. If the synthetic voice will remain in the final, check pronunciation on brand names and technical terms and fix them with phonetic spelling before generating the full script. Always leave 300 to 500 milliseconds of headroom at the start of the file so you can trim cleanly.
Use generated beds for temp tracks, but be deliberate about whether you will license a final track. Layering two thin generated beds — one for rhythm, one for atmosphere — usually beats one dense track, because you can fade them independently under dialogue.
Auto-transcription is accurate enough to use as a caption base, but budget time for a proofread. Names, numbers, and accented speech are the usual failure points. Export captions as a sidecar file rather than burning them in, so you can restyle them without re-rendering the whole piece.
The "AI look" is rarely about resolution. It is about three things: unnaturally clean surfaces, mismatched grain, and flat lighting with no falloff.
Fix the lighting mismatch first. Add a subtle vignette and a gentle gradient on the generated element, then grade it toward the surrounding footage using a shared color reference — a neutral gray card or a known skin tone from your camera footage.
Then match texture. Apply grain, chromatic aberration, and a very small amount of blur to the crispest layer so all layers share the same optical character. Real footage has softness; generated footage often does not.
Finally, break the symmetry. Generated compositions tend toward centered, balanced framing. Cropping slightly off-center, adding a foreground element that occludes part of the frame, or introducing a small lens flare all push the image away from synthetic perfection and toward something that feels photographed.
A 45-second product spot, vertical, aimed at paid social.
Total generation time is a fraction of the session. Most of the clock goes to compositing, timing, and sound — the parts that still require a human.
Do I still need manual rotoscoping? Yes, occasionally. Subject-aware mattes handle most shots, but fast motion, heavy motion blur, and semi-transparent edges still need cleanup. Budget a small amount of manual time on any shot with hair or fabric detail.
Is AI-generated footage good enough for broadcast? At 4K with a proper upscale pass and matched grain, generated plates hold up well for backgrounds, inserts, and atmospheric elements. Hero shots with dialogue still favor captured footage.
How many versions of a generated clip should I keep? Keep every version until the shot is locked, and name them with a version suffix. Regenerating a shot you deleted three days ago is the most avoidable delay in this workflow.
What order should I work in? Picture first, then sound design, then color and grain, then captions. Color decisions made before the edit is locked get thrown away.
Can I mix generated and camera footage in one shot? Yes, and it is the most common production use. Match grain, sharpness, and lighting direction, and keep the generated element in a supporting role rather than the focal point.
The pattern across all of this is consistent: AI removes the expensive, repetitive layer of post-production and leaves the decisions that need judgment. Editors who build a repeatable pipeline around that division of labor finish faster without their work looking like it came off an assembly line.

Alexander
Vidu Q4 alternatives compared: Kling 4.0, Seedance 2.5, Wan 3.0, and Runway Gen-4 — 4K support, input modes, durations, audio, and what each costs in credits on Domer.
The top 4K AI image generators on Domer compared: Flux 3 Klein, Nano Banana 2.1, GPT Image 2.5, GPT Image 2, and Nano Banana Pro — 4K credit costs, reference limits, and speed.
Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.5 Flare compared: credit costs per resolution, aspect ratios, reference images, text rendering, and which tasks fit each model.